home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
InfoMagic Standards 1994 January
/
InfoMagic Standards - January 1994.iso
/
inet
/
ietf
/
pppext
/
92nov.min
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1993-02-17
|
4KB
|
128 lines
Editor's Note: Minutes received 12/21/92
CURRENT_MEETING_REPORT_
Reported by Brian Lloyd/ B.P. Lloyd & Associates
Minutes of the Point-to-Point Protocol Extensions Working Group (PPPEXT)
Document Status
o New RFCs
- AppleTalk CP 1378
- DECNET
- OSI
- IPXWAN 1362
o Internet-Drafts
- LCP Extensions - largely complete
- Compression - being written, not ready for discussion,
compression control protocol
- LAPB - being written, not ready for discussion
* Numbered mode
* MLAP procedure
* Link association
* Use of RFC 1294 segmentation
- IPXCP Compromise between Novell desires and other vendors
desires largely complete. Awaiting a few small editorial
changes prior to last call.
- Van Jacobsen Compression for IPX out for discussion.
- Bridging to Draft Standard add ``my MAC Address is'' option.
Testing Document Subgroup
Two issues: what to test and how to test it. Fred Baker suggested
making PT-500 tests available for the purposes; available tests are for
synchronous implementations. PPP Consortium could make available to
vendors, to make implementations more reliable.
The PPPEXT Working Group and the IPLPDN Working Group met together to
discuss using the PPP negotiation mechanisms on PDNs using Frame Relay.
Frame Relay/PPP Parameter Negotiation
o Active PPP Open
The idea here is that an older Frame Relay system can talk to a
newer one by the newer one detecting the other and switching to the
1
old mechanism.
o Agglutination of PPP negotiation parameters (Multiple Option
Negotiation)
Some sort of LCP option saying ``I want to do <protocol list > in
the default manner''. Breaks authentication; NCPs happen after
authentication completes. Solution: an LCP configure could be
sent as a single datagram carrying a succession of messages.
o Agglutination of PPP negotiation parameters (Multiple Option
o OUI Acquisition
Need the necessary OUI for PPP message identification.
o Agglutination of PPP negotiation parameters (Multiple Option
o OUI/PID values for PPP
PID should be PPP Protocol Identifier.
o Agglutination of PPP negotiation parameters (Multiple Option
o Multi-link Transport
Layered implementation suggested.
Attendees
Fred Baker fbaker@acc.com
Ken Benstead kbenstead@coral.com
Daniel Brennan dmb@teleoscom.com
Caralyn Brown cbrown@wellfleet.com
Kay Chang chang@chang.austin.ibm.com
Dean Cheng dean@sun2.retix.com
Chi Chong cchong@synoptics.com
Nabil Damouny nabil@tdd.sj.nec.com
James Forster forster@cisco.com
Shoji Fukutomi fuku@furukawa.co.jp
Paul Griffiths griff@chang.austin.ibm.com
Thomas Hacker hacker@citi.umich.edu
Frank Heath heath@cmc.com
Marco Hernandez marco@mh-slip.educom.edu
Ken Hirata khirata@emulex.com
Jeff Hughes jeff@col.hp.com
Bob Jeckell rrj@3com.com
George Kajos kajos@coral.com
Mark Lewis mlewis@telebit.com
David Lin lind@janus-ccm.zenith.com
Andrew Malis malis@bbn.com
Julianne Myers jmyers@network.com
Brad Parker brad@fcr.com
Drew Perkins perkins+@cmu.edu
Christopher Ranch cranch@novell.com
Greg Ratta gregra@cc.bellcore.com
William Simpson Bill.Simpson@um.cc.umich.edu
2
^L
Eva Wang eva@penril.com
James Watt james@newbridge.com
Brenda Whitehurst brenda@penril.com
Ian Wilson ianw@spider.co.uk
Honda Wu honda@nat.com
3